Category Archives: Software

Digital dilemma

Inspired by Charles’ efforts to improve the performance of his Mac without reinstalling the O/S, and finally fed up with the bloating that my Windows install had taken, I resolved this morning to fix it by whatever means necessary – even considering the possibility of a total reinstall and digging up the OEM Windows CD my Dell came with (this, of course, mocked as ‘Windows approach’ by Mac afficionados everywhere). And it had to be done in time for the football

So I started – initially just uninstalling the useless freeware that I’ve installed over the last two years (the length of time this Windows install has been active and, erm, “stable”), and gradually started to see improvement. After a couple of major hiccups, I decided I needed to clean the bits of the registry that were beginning to really nark me off (bizarre applications for long-since removed hardware still launching, for example…) – and a manual session with ‘regedit’ followed. But there were still bugs.

Frustrated, and reluctant to reinstall Windows and let the Mac-lovers have their moment of triumph, I found a shareware registry doctor, which I’ve since bought, called Advanced Registry Doctor. It rocks: not only does it actually fix some of the more tedious problems I was experiencing, but it lets you browse the startup entries in your registry — and as well as letting you deselect or delete certain components, it (shock, horror) tells you what they are and if you need them active! Good performance bonus there. It also had a registry defragmentation option, which seems to have immediately improved the performance of my PC.

Having done all that, I’ve upgraded a couple of device drivers and the machine seems pretty stable – my NAS drive has thus far failed to cause the blue screen of death, despite a couple of hours continuous operation (it was pretty bad before). I’m geekily pleased with myself.

Of course, it sounds like Charles sorted out his Mac much more easily, and I’m not really winning and PC vs Mac debates here. And I certainly won’t make a grand defence of the system architecture that causes a PC to experience a hundred years of human aging in a 2 year period — my machine was experiencing some serious moments of senile dementia — but it is good to find a workaround. Recommend the above software to anyone whose machine has started to grunt under the weight of its age and either can’t face the prospect of reinstalling or doesn’t have the necessary knowledge to do so.

P.s. I don’t hate Macs, btw. My relationship with Apple is a bit more complex than that and I may blog about it sometime. Suffice to say that I think there’s a lot of truth in this.

Type, scratch, pad.

According to this website.

And the below test:

The exercise was
I was surprised when representatives from several major airlines informed me that the period between kitchen prep to passenger consumption is usually one day..Airlines reduce the journey time of meals from the kitchen to your tray by contracting with catering companies all over the globe.

You typed
I was surprised when representatives from several major airlines informed me that the period between kitchen prep to passenger consumption is usually one day. Airlines reduce the journey time of meals from the kitchn to your tray by contracting with catering companies all over the globe.

Your speed was 81 WPM with 1 mistake (adjusted speed 80 WPM)

I type faster than Charles Arthur, technology editor of the Guardian. Which gives me, erm, no sense of satisfaction from the feat in itself, but did give me a chance to test out Google Notebook, which seems to work quite well (its kind of a web-based scratchpad, probably tying into the Google desktop tool of that name…

It is cool – although very much a limited beta, I think. You can’t even right click on it; I mean, come on! But it works with the same kind of Ajaxian javascript that Google Talk (web) does, so I guess right clicking would be much to hope for…

Google Desktop vs. Copernic

So I’ve just switched over to Google Desktop, having been using Copernic for about a year (and Lookout before that). It’s much improved over its previous incarnations; includes integration into Outlook and does find things very easily. So kudos. Google’s also a lot more stable than Copernic was (so far, even on my hulking desktop), which was one of about four applications that regularly stopped responding whilst it drained my CPU of all available resource.

On the minus side, it seems to be bloating. I want a fully thin client app (and like the Scratch pad utility as such) but really, really dislike the sheer memory consuming chunkiness of all the sidebar elements. And so have disabled them…

Do think that this type of unstructured search software will be increasingly important; I’m waiting for Google to move the indexes online, move the file storage online, secure it all properly and enable multiple profiles (Armand work, Armand home, Armand laptop, Armand PDA) to take care of the remaining offline content, and then we’re away!

Boot time

It now takes a little over 8 minutes for my PC to get to a usable starting point.

Damn. Think its time to reinstall Windows. And if anyone tells me I should get a Mac I will fight them.

Firefox issues

Does anyone else find that Firefox occasionally decides to suck up 100 meg of RAM and 95% of your CPU? Is this a known bug? Is there anyway to fix it other than restarting FF a couple of times a day?

Come on, my fave browser!

Also (and a long shot) – anyone know if Firefox will be made Sharepoint compliant?

And who am I talking to, exactly?

Feels like bloatware

Just installed the public beta of Windows Live Messenger after reading about it on Pocket Lint.

It has been reskinned, and sure there are other cute features, but the install package is up to 16 meg. COME ON! People use it to send instant messages, it is an instant message client. Plain, simple, text messages.

The ‘collaboration’ machine it seems to be turning into resembles the kind of software bloating that killed ICQ (well, it was either that or the AOL acquisition, but I think the bloating came first). Who knows, though? Maybe this whole ‘Live’ strategy will pay off.

But it seems a step in the wrong direction: I’m enjoying thin client web-apps that leave my machine stable (well, within reason. I’m no (shudder) Mac User). Case in point: Google Talk is 900k and does nearly everything I want it to (if it did multi-way chat, that would be it). And it has a web interface that doesn’t require 10 minutes to load…

So, will Office 12 be bloated? Or slimmed up? If anyone at MS is reading and wants to give me a beta to try I’ll be happy to blog my opinion ;).