All posts by Armand

Funning gog

Charles points to Stuart Bruce who points at the Juicy Studio readability test. This handy little beasty tells you how readable your website is, based on some criteria that Messrs. Gunning and Fog presumably came up with at some point when such things were important (where were they when Jane Austen was writing, I ask you!? Mind you, they don’t do anything about the word:event ratio).

In any case – Stuart, on his sample of about 15 blogs, determines that PRs are less readable than journalists. My score of 9.74 stands me in the cateory of “most popular novels”, though, which I can live with, even if it is marginally higher than Charles, Gary and a few others…

I’ll read someone else’s blog for a little while, I think…

Type, scratch, pad.

According to this website.

And the below test:

The exercise was
I was surprised when representatives from several major airlines informed me that the period between kitchen prep to passenger consumption is usually one day..Airlines reduce the journey time of meals from the kitchen to your tray by contracting with catering companies all over the globe.

You typed
I was surprised when representatives from several major airlines informed me that the period between kitchen prep to passenger consumption is usually one day. Airlines reduce the journey time of meals from the kitchn to your tray by contracting with catering companies all over the globe.

Your speed was 81 WPM with 1 mistake (adjusted speed 80 WPM)

I type faster than Charles Arthur, technology editor of the Guardian. Which gives me, erm, no sense of satisfaction from the feat in itself, but did give me a chance to test out Google Notebook, which seems to work quite well (its kind of a web-based scratchpad, probably tying into the Google desktop tool of that name…

It is cool – although very much a limited beta, I think. You can’t even right click on it; I mean, come on! But it works with the same kind of Ajaxian javascript that Google Talk (web) does, so I guess right clicking would be much to hope for…

Things I wrote in my notebook that no longer make sense

…but do now seem vaguely poetic.

Do all writers have unkempt hair? Tom Clancy?
Are all my thoughts worth sharing? Doubt it…
Random writing thoughts: trick arrows/explosive sheath/fuse?/pocket flint/patent law/brands
Literary lords? High.
Nightschool?
Ruins?
Ancient antiseptics?
Selecting one from the crowd for drama.
Old mercenaries like to wake up early
Do I want to be a teacher?
Meniscology @ the cafe

From cult to mainstream

Was having a conversation with siblings a couple of months ago about how things make the leap from cult to mainstream – for example, Spider-Man, the comic – largely cult. Spider-Man, the movie – definitely mainstream. Some don’t succeed – the Hitchhiker’s film, much as I enjoyed it, was clearly one of those that failed to break the ‘cult’ barrier.

The X-Men are a trickier. Have they brokered the divide into the mainstream with their recent set of films? I think they did with the first two – but the third suffers from Too Much Source Material – the writers clearly got confused as to which of the universes they wanted to draw upon.

See, I really enjoy the little jokes they bury in the film for fans to enjoy – but when character development is stunted (as it is for Colossus in the X3, for example) – it becomes that much harder for non-fans to understand the emotional subtext in key scenes.

I can’t say much more without spoiling the film (and it still doesn’t open for a couple of days!), but would be interested to hear thoughts on other films that have successfully bridge the gap between cult and the mainstream and what made them successful.

For me, there are always two components – solid character development and a simple, believable plot – and by ‘believable’ please don’t assume I mean realistic, I would never ask for that – but rather one that passes its own laws of internal consistency. Like Mr McKee, I’m not a fan of deus ex machina

The evolution of the mobile

So, was thinking about this the other day (because that’s what I do sometimes…); I’ve lived through four paradigmatic design concepts for the ‘chic’ mobile phone of the day… in a little over a decade.

In the early 90s, my Dad’s second ever mobile phone was a Motorola Micro-Tac, a chunky beast that was a predecessor of the clamshell phone. It weight about a metric tonne and had the aesthetic appeal of a wet brick, but hey – it was early days for the technology.

Next (after dozens of bland, conventional, soap-bar shaped phones) was the Matrix phone; chalk one up for Nokia, that was one good bit of product placement. I had that one for a year and absolutely loved the button that flicked the mouthpiece down.

But the two latest trophies belong to Samsung, as far as I’m concerned. I’m going to ignore the Razr, because clever though it was to make it thin, and metallic, its fundementally a clamshell phone, the award for which I think goes to this phone (or a close relative, can’t quite remember the model number). It was one of the first generation of colour screen mobiles (Tom had one until quite recently), and was very cool. Samsung marketed it heavily and think they did well with it.

The next chic-phone, and victim of a range of imitators at the moment is the new slidey form function.

Wonder what’s next – hopefully no more failed concepts like this Nokia. What do I have? None of the above – I prefer function over form these days, and love my SPV c600….

The knowledge economy

Have noticed lately a few mobile and broadband providers seem to be looking to lock in their customers for longer contracts – 18 months at a time. Much as this makes sense as a customer retention strategy, can’t imagine it will do anything other than nark consumers off… Certainly I’ll avoid it unless they promise me very, very good incentives (and I’m confident of their customer service levels).

On the other hand, it does mark a decline in the great acquistion drive for ‘new’ technologies — after an astonishingly short period of time. To reach saturation point in the market such as you’re already competing for each others customers at this stage – bravo, the knowledge economy is practically here.

Of course, the digital divide hasn’t been crossed as yet – there’s still a large minority of the population who don’t have access to the latest and greatest services; what’s to be done about them? Well, hopefully we’ll see some government investment and some regulatory controls pushing to make Britain an information egalitarian state [sic], even if the Tories do win the next election. That would make an interesting (if particularly geeky) episode of Yes Minister.

There is an interesting piece on Silicon.com that speculates that an information economy will only truly be driven by all pervasive, ultra fast broadband… there’s some truth in that (although I’m not sure if 1 Gbp/s is it!).

Dogma vs. The Da Vinci Code

Don’t know why people didn’t raise the same fuss over Dogma – it’s got to challenge at least as many of the same institutional ‘truths’ – I guess maybe people don’t take Kevin Smith as seriously as they take Dan Brown, which makes me sad with the universe. Kevin Smith is a genius.

And yes, I am watching E4 tonight…

Garfield, Sir Bob, & Me

I normally don’t find Mondays too distasteful, but have woken up this morning feeling slightly like a small freight train ran into, and then over me, repeatedly. Just one of those mornings, I guess… I’d like to crawl back into bed and go to sleep now; but sadly the responsibilities of adulthood beckon.

Damn, I wish I was still a kid. I know how Seth feels.

Randy is a genius

Have had a number of conversations with people about Earl of late – probably at least in part due to frustration about missing it this week when Sky was down. There is a consistent agreement that the Way of Randy is a reassuring and calming path to walk. Although I always bring it up as a joke to explain to people what the show is and why I like it, a remakarable proportion of the people I’ve mentioned it to who enjoy the show have developed their own empathy for Randy.

What a guy.